Does anyone else find it ironic that Google Reader doesn’t have a search function?
I mean, c’mon. Google is known almost solely for search. Google reader aggregates tens of articles a day for me. And if I don’t remember where I read that one thing last week, I’m apparently outa luck finding it again.
I’m still holding out for it to become integrated with Gmail, but even if that never happens, Google still has standards to live up to. They’ve set a high bar for themselves.
Would it really be that hard for them to stuff some searchy goodness in there?
well, that’s google for ya. It’s quite difficult to master,
but eventually it starts to be nice. good luck
No, Google sets all kinds of de-facto standards with their ease of use. I mean, like half the internet uses Google as a home page, and most people don’t have any clue how to put together a good query.
Google Reader is pretty much as easy as you can get with an RSS feed reader. But it still needs search.
Wow
your right. That is weird
I use Google Reader daily and searching for archived posts would be really nice.
you still didn’t go to sleep?
It’s gotta have search somewhere, it’s GOOGLE for crying out loud.
)
(What’s a reader?
So, how is Google Reader different from the real google?
@Elizabeth: Google is a brand, Google Reader is a product. The link I provided in-post explains what Reader is and does better then I can.
Oh, (smacking myself on the forehead) well that explains it. ( :X )
That’s where I think RSS Feeders like Feeddemon and others work because search is so helpful to find those old posts on a blog.
Josh Chandler
http://www.techilious.wordpress.com